Find out now if you qualify. Time is limited to file a claim. You may be entitled to compensation. Fill out the form below to see if you qualify.
Free Claim Review
We are here to listen and help.
Submit below to speak with our team.
Ronnie Roman Sexual Abuse Claim Help
Information submitted will be transmitted to a law firm. This communication is intended to be an attorney-client communication for purposes of evaluating your claim and will be kept confidential by the law firm. The communication does not create an attorney-client relationship and no relationship is formed until a fee agreement is signed by you and the law firm. I also have read and agree to your Privacy Policy
File Your Claim Now
April 2022: The MDL Paraquat class action judge will have a status conference on April 1st to review where the litigation is headed and how best to take the bellwether lawsuits forward for trial in November 2022. 44 new paraquat lawsuits have been added to the MDL in the last two weeks. At this pace, April 2022 will be the busiest month for new files yet. Last week, the parties filed their class-action bellwether picks with the Paraquat MDL judge. Those choices, however, have not been made public.
May 2022: In the last month, over 50 new cases have been added to the Paraquat Lawsuit Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). A group of six patients was recently selected by the Paraquat MDL court for the initial Paraquat Parkinson's disease bellwether trials. As a result, the first trial in November 2022 is approaching soon. The strategy is to select 16 paraquat claims from among the almost 1000 Parkinson's disease litigation claims filed. Following some limited fact discovery in these instances, paraquat attorneys on both sides submitted a preference list to the MDL court, ranking the 16 cases in order of priority. Attorneys for plaintiffs seek the finest facts for their clients, while defense attorneys want the worst. The judge whittled the list down to six Paraquat claims based on these rankings.
CLAIM UPDATES
We are here to listen and help answer all your questions. Contact us today for a Free Claim Review by filling out the form above.
Fill out the form above to learn if you qualify. It’s fast, free, and confidential. Don’t wait – your health and justice matter.
Together, we can fight back against asbestos exposure and its devastating health effects.
Seek Justice Today
Maryland Juvenile Detention
Abuse Claim Help
Jeff Brandow
Sexual Abuse
Claim Help
File Your Claim Now
How to Qualify for a Depo-Provera Claim:
Use of Depo-Provera
Diagnosis of Brain Tumor
Document Evidence
Submit The Form Above
Depo-Provera is an injectable birth control containing the synthetic hormone medroxyprogesterone acetate, is linked to an increased risk of meningioma, a rare brain tumor. This risk was not adequately disclosed to consumers or medical professionals. Studies, including those published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), have shown that long-term use of Depo-Provera significantly raises the risk of developing meningiomas.
Claims against Pfizer, Inc., the drug’s manufacturer, alleges that the company knew or should have known about the increased risk of meningiomas—brain tumors that can cause severe neurological symptoms—especially with prolonged use. The claims state that Pfizer failed to adequately warn doctors and patients, rushed the drug to market without sufficient long-term studies, and prioritized profits over safety.
Due to the rising number of claims against Pfizer regarding Depo-Provera and brain tumors have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in federal court. Affected individuals may seek compensation for medical expenses, long-term care, and other damages, with the potential for federal court consolidation of cases.
Asbestos Help Direct
Compensation Support - Start Here
Notable Settlements
If you have been diagnosed with any of these conditions after 2022, it’s time to take action. Our experienced legal team is here to help you determine if you qualify for compensation. By joining an asbestos lawsuit, you can seek justice and hold manufacturers and employers accountable for their negligence.
QUALIFY IN MINUTES
Lung Cancer, Mesothelioma, Colon Cancer, Laryngeal Cancer, Pharyngeal Cancer, or Esophageal Cancer—if you’ve been diagnosed with any of these after 2022 and worked in a trade before 1990, your illness may be linked to toxic exposure on the job. Many workers are just now getting diagnosed with cancers caused by long-term, low-level exposure to asbestos and other toxins. Legal claims are being filed across the country—some resulting in compensation in the hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of dollars.
Thousands of tradesmen were unknowingly exposed to cancer-causing materials on job sites—decades later, these exposures are now being linked to serious illnesses. If your diagnosis came after 2022, there may still be time to file a claim, even if your exposure happened decades ago.
Why Should You File?
Qualifying Occupations & Trades
Boilermaker
Brick Mason
Carpenter
Roofer
Electrician
Grinder
Insulator
Longshoreman
Welder
Machinist
Laborer
Maintenance Mechanic
Millwright
Pipefitter
Painter
Merchant Marine
Sandblaster
Operator
Railroad Worker
Clutch Work
Brake Work
& More...
Lung cancer stands as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, affecting a significant portion of the population. Statistics reveal that 1 in 16 individuals will confront a lung cancer diagnosis during their lifetime, impacting more than 236,000 Americans annually.
Trokey v Ford Motor Co. (Missouri 2022) $20,000,000: A jury granted $20 million to a car mechanic and his spouse. The technician was diagnosed with mesothelioma after working with brakes produced with asbestos, which Ford Motor firm, the firm found liable at trial, manufactured.
O’Reilly v US Steel Corp. (Illinois 2022) $7,217,656: A former pipefitter died at age 62 from pleural mesothelioma and his family brought a wrongful death action against a large group of asbestos defendants. Some of the defendants settled, but U.S. Steel and Fisher Controls Intl. went to trial. Jury awarded $7.2 million, but the award was reduced to $3.7 million based on comparative negligence.
Ibarra v Ameron International (Oregon 2022) $30,000,000: Decedent was exposed to asbestos when he worked at a factory in 1974. In 2021 he died from mesothelioma and his spouse brought a wrongful death action. Jury awarded $30 million.
Constantine v Lenox Instrument Co. (Pennsylvania 2022) $2,218,415: Decedent was exposed to asbestos from 1972 to 1981 while working as a draftsmen designer on jet engines for the Navy. In 2019 he died of mesothelioma. The jury awarded $2.2 million to his spouse for wrongful death.
Kraemer v Lone Star Inc. (Washington 2021) $10,000,000: Plaintiff was a 79-year-old retired school principal diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma. Plaintiff’s father worked as an insulator at naval shipyards during WWII and plaintiff was exposed to asbestos as a child from his father’s work clothes.
Cowger v Qualitex Co. (Illinois 2021) $23,000,000: Plaintiff was exposed to asbestos when she worked in an industrial laundry during the 1970s. She later developed mesothelioma. Jury in Chicago awarded $23 million.
Mada v Cincinnati Inc. (California 2021) $710,000: Former sheet metal worker died from mesothelioma. Defendant manufactured machines that the decedent operated at work and those machines contained asbestos friction parts. Verdict was lower because defendant was only found 5% at fault.
Jennings v Honeywell International (Ohio 2021) $10,657,189: Former mechanic was exposed to asbestos in brake pads manufactured by defendant Honeywell (f/k/a Bendix Corporation) and later died of mesothelioma. The estate settled with several other defendants before going to trial.
